An elected board could jeopardize Montclair’s magnet schools (Letter to the Editor)
As the pandemic subsides and schools reopen, it is natural to revisit the institutions and processes by which policy decisions are made. However, I urge the citizens of Montclair to retain the appointed board of education, and vote no on Nov. 2 to the referendum that would change Montclair from a Type I to Type II school system.
The fabric and strength of Montclair has long been its commitment to diversity, and our appointed board is designed to enable the elected mayor to assemble through appointment a group of citizens reflective of the community and possessing the skills necessary for good decision-making on behalf of our public schools. As with any institution, some appointees and assembled groups work more effectively than others, and we can all point to more as well as less effective eras.
Nevertheless, our schools, especially through our magnet system, have complemented the goals of maintaining diversity and enabling our children to work and learn in community schools that reflect the world in which they will live. Indeed, many of us with children who have graduated from our public schools have heard them cite the excellent academic preparation, interpersonal relationships, and resilience-building skills they have acquired to navigate the future. Our magnet schools could be jeopardized by an elected board eager to reduce operational costs.
However, accountability is always key to an effective board of education, and we strongly urge our community stakeholders, parents and press to ask hard questions and demand answers. Because appointment to the board of education is both an honor and a responsibility, the League of Women Voters of the Montclair Area (of which I am member) recommends the Township council’s creation of an advisory committee to suggest excellent candidates for nomination. This has been helpful to other towns (such as Summit) that have appointed boards of education.
In our divisive times, we read of much strife played out all over the United States at board of education meetings regarding mask mandates and other hot-button issues, and single-issue candidates can drive elections. Montclair deserves better, so I urge voters to reject the proposed change and maintain their commitment to a diverse and excellent public school system.
Cynthia M. Rogers
Montclair Local's Opinion section is an open forum for civil discussion in which we invite readers to discuss town matters, articles published in Montclair, or previously published letters. Views expressed and published in this section are solely those of the writers, and do not represent the views of Montclair Local.
Letters to the editor: To submit a letter to the editor, email email@example.com, or mail "Letters to the Editor," 309 Orange Road, Montclair, NJ, 07042 (email is preferred). Submissions must include the name, address and phone number of the writer for verification. Only the writer's name and town of residence will be published. Montclair Local does not publish anonymous opinion pieces.
Letters must be no more than 500 words in length, and must be received by 5 p.m. Monday to be eligible for potential publication in that week's Thursday print issue. Letters may be edited by Montclair Local for grammar and style. While our goal is to publish most letters we receive, Montclair Local reserves the right to decline publication of a letter for any reason, including but not limited to concerns about unproven or defamatory statements, inappropriate language, topic matter far afield of the particular interests of Montclair residents, or available space.
Town Square: Montclair Local also accepts longer-form opinion essays from residents aiming to generate discussion on topics specific to the community, under our "Town Square" banner. "Town Square" essays should be no more than 750 words in length, and topics should be submitted to firstname.lastname@example.org at least seven days prior to publication.