Letters recently published here opposing an elected Board of Education share a common fallacy: they describe nightmarish potential future scenarios while ignoring that these events have already occurred under an appointed board.

One nightmare is a BOE owned by special interests and/or big money. This can already be seen today in the gross imbalance of spending between candidates in recent council elections, including the 60-fold difference in the most recent election when the township was blanketed with glossy mailers sent by a Trenton PAC, and ballots equal to the margin of victory were left oddly yet conveniently uncounted. A BOE appointed by a mayor requires that special interests win only a single seat in a single election to take control of the board and therefore our schools. An elected board would raise this bar, requiring those interests to win multiple seats over multiple elections in multiple years. This offers more protection than our schools and students have today.

Another nightmare proposed is the loss of our magnet schools. This would involve seeking relief from the current desegregation order. It would presumably be proposed to reduce spending on transportation. Disturbingly, with our operating budget inflating over the 2% cap just considering a few line items, and years of underinvestment in our capital budget, we're already on this path. The annual screeches of "deficit" and subsequent cuts, along with stairs collapsing beneath students, locker walls falling on students, masonry falling from buildings that has luckily — so far — not fallen on students, unrepaired ventilation including in restrooms and so forth all speak to a budget on a path to desperation.

Nightmares that writers have proposed as possible consequences of an elected board are already a consequence of our appointed board. An elected BOE would offer more protection against special interests and big money. An elected board would free us of the destructively
parsimonious Board of School Estimate, and would permit the BOE and voters to escape the chokehold of the 2% cap. An elected Board of Education is what Montclair needs to escape the nightmares brought on by too many years of an appointed BOE and BoSE starving our schools and depriving our children of the education they require and deserve.

Andrew Gideon


Montclair Local's Opinion section is an open forum for civil discussion in which we invite readers to discuss town matters, articles published in Montclair, or previously published letters. Views expressed and published in this section are solely those of the writers, and do not represent the views of Montclair Local.

Letters to the editor: To submit a letter to the editor, email letters@montclairlocal.news, or mail "Letters to the Editor," 309 Orange Road, Montclair, NJ, 07042 (email is preferred). Submissions must include the name, address and phone number of the writer for verification. Only the writer's name and town of residence will be published. Montclair Local does not publish anonymous opinion pieces.

Letters must be no more than 500 words in length, and must be received by 5 p.m. Monday to be eligible for potential publication in that week's Thursday print issue. Letters may be edited by Montclair Local for grammar and style. While our goal is to publish most letters we receive, Montclair Local reserves the right to decline publication of a letter for any reason, including but not limited to concerns about unproven or defamatory statements, inappropriate language, topic matter far afield of the particular interests of Montclair residents, or available space.

Town Square: Montclair Local also accepts longer-form opinion essays from residents aiming to generate discussion on topics specific to the community, under our "Town Square" banner. "Town Square" essays should be no more than 750 words in length, and topics should be submitted to letters@montclairlocal.news at least seven days prior to publication.